January 12, 2002
BORROWING FILM CLIPS DEEMED A FAIR USE
Under U.S. law it is well recognized that a writer can quote from another writer’s copyrighted work. A reviewer, for example, can quote a short passage from a book that is being reviewed. The doctrine permitting this use is known as the fair use doctrine.
While copyright principles apply to filmmakers and other authors who create copyrighted works, it has never been clear to what extent film clips can be borrowed under the fair use doctrine. The practice of many cautious producers is to license clips, even of very limited duration. Two recent federal cases shed some light on the issue, and they may encourage producers to forgo licensing short clips.
The plaintiff (P) in both cases was a person who had acquired copyrights to many movies produced by American International Pictures (AIP). In the first case, the P complained about the use of clips from AIP movies in a documentary about AIP titled “It Conquered the World” produced by the American Movie Classics (AMC) cable channel. While the P had initially agreed to accept a $36,000 license fee for use of the excerpts for cable exhibition, the P apparently changed her mind and ultimately declined to sign the license agreement. Instead, the P sought an injunction which the court refused to issue.
The judge reasoned that AMC’s use of the clips would likely be considered a “Fair use.” The court stated, “Just as a parody” needs to mimic an original to make its point... and a biographer is permitted to quote his subject, so too a documentary about two film makers should be permitted to sparingly show clips of the subject’s works.
Here the filmmaker took five clips ranging from 10 seconds to 54 seconds, with an average length of 26 seconds.
The second suit filed by the P was a result of the Arts & Entertainment (A&E) series “Biography.” A& E used clips from the AIP documentary in a piece about actor Peter Graves titled “Peter Graves: Mission Accomplished.” The program used 20 seconds of footage from a trailer that had been used to promote the exhibition of “It Conquered the World.” This excerpt amounted to less than one percent of A&E’s 70 minute program. The court dismissed the P’s case on a motion for summary judgment.
These cases illustrate that filmmakers may be able, under the fair use doctrine, to take short excerpts from pre-existing films without licensing the footage. Of course, it never hurts to have a license, and there is no assurance that other courts will follow these decisions.
The cases are Hofheinz v. AMC Productions, Inc., 147 F. Supp. 2d 127, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1591 (E.D.N.Y. 2001); and Hofheinz v. A&E Television Networks, 146 F. Supp. 2d 442, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8616 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
With the price of gas in the modern day, I've looked around at scooters/mopeds a little bit. An interesting thing out there is the 3 whe...
-
After a very long hiatus, I've been reinfected with the photography bug thanks to acquiring a new digital SLR (some of my recent work i...
-
New York City has lowest crime rate . Good, now maybe I can finally get somebody to buy that bridge I purchased last year.
-
Apparently both the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and Facebook intend to hold separate press conferences tomorrow to discuss the outcome of...
-
Google has just launced "Latitude", which uses the GPS on your smartphone to share your location with your friends. Though it look...
-
You have to tell your client if the prosecutor is prosecuting you too .
-
According to the Edmonton Journal, Frank Work is stepping down as the information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta. He has held the offic...
-
Part 1 of 4. Tuesday will be the Criminal Procedure cases.
-
I've been overwhelmed by the number of questions I've received in response to " Ask the privacy lawyer ". Some of them are...
-
How in the world do you break into a house and cut the clothes off the person living there without waking her?