Okay, it may not be the brightest thing in the world to publicly call a judge a witch on a blog - even if you can't get dooced for it. Actually, I guess if the Bar is trying to throw you out you are being dooced by one of the masters you are forced to serve as a lawyer. However, the Florida Supreme Court seems to have noticed that there hasn't been a constitutional convention revoking the 1st Amendment as it applies to lawyers and/or judges. Now we wait to see what happens.
via Legal Ethics Forum
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
With the price of gas in the modern day, I've looked around at scooters/mopeds a little bit. An interesting thing out there is the 3 whe... -
An interesting part of Michigan v. Bryant is the hostility which bleeds through the decision to the decoupling of the hearsay exceptions fr...
-
June 16, 2004 In this newsletter: HAWAII EXTENDS ACT 221 Hawaii has some very impressive and generous tax incentives. Considering all the pu...
-
There's been a bit of a buzz lately about laptop inspections by the Department of Homeland Security ( Crossing the border? Consider the ...
-
In the "Street View" lawsuit with the Borings (see: Boring lawsuit over Google's "Street View" ), Google has filed a...
-
Every time I get on Facebook it tries to set me up with someone. Now, not to be too cynical about things, but girls who looked like that wer... -
This is the first Canadian case of "medical identity theft" or impersonation that I've seen widely reported: CBC News - Calgar...
-
This month's edition of The National magazine ( National (English) - October/November 2010 ) has a significant multi-page article on pri...