All that said, here is the nightmare scenario given form.
Why there are no cameras in the Supreme Court
Generally, I am a believer that all court proceedings, including the federal supreme court, should be televised. However, there is a persuasive argument that in appellate courts - particularly the federal supreme court - there are those who would grandstand instead of arguing the points. Personally, while I recognize this type of behavior is a possibility, I think that the benefits of an open court outweigh it.
All that said, here is the nightmare scenario given form.
All that said, here is the nightmare scenario given form.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular entries
-
Now, here's a tactic I've not yet seen in court (not sure this one will work for us guys).
-
According to Computerworld Security, Google has started collecting images of European streets for its Street View feature, but is holding of...
-
April 23, 2004 In this newsletter: T HE COURT DISMISSES CLAIM THAT THE OWNERS OF THE COMEDY CENTRAL INFRINGED RIGHTS WHEN THEY AIRED A CLIP ...
-
Y'know, it's kinda cool that the governor is up on his history, but is contemplating a pardon for Billy the Kid really that importa...
-
The General Assembly has relented and decided to allow us (at least some of us) to have judges again . As of 01 July 2011 we in the 30th wil...
-
With Google's recent launch of Street View in Europe and imminent photographing of Canadian cities, I thought I'd do some quick look...
-
June 14, 2002 WGA UNVEILS NEW LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT The Writers Guild has announced a new agreement for indie films with budgets of $750,000...
-
This afternoon, my partner Rob Cowan ( @cowanlaw ) and I jointly presented at Magazines East 2011 on legal issues of relevance to magazine ...
-
Sorry about the headline. I thought I could do beter than the one written by Stuff.co.nz. I have reported on toilet cams on this site in the...
